🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.